Apr 27 2009

Majority of Members Abstain from Ratifying New Collective Agreement

Category: Post-strike Discussion (2009)Bob Hanke @ 12:51 pm

While the April 24, 2009 headlines read CUPE 3903 ratifies mediated multi-year agreements with York University, here is a breakdown of the actual Unit 2 voting results:

70% Yes (117 people voted)
28% No (46 people voted)
2% spoiled ballots (4 people voted)

With about 900 members, this represents only 18.5 % of the eligible voters. 733 people, or 81.4%, abstained from voting altogether. If participation in voting is essential to give legitimacy to political-economic authority and decision making, these results suggest that this “negotiated agreement” lacks such legitimacy.

President Shoukri claims that York “values the skills and talents of our employees.” In reality, graduate employees and contract faculty are the ghosts in the massified teaching factory. More of the curriculum has been allocated to them but they appear and disappear only to be replaced by new Ph.Ds or hired on per-course contracts to fill curricular holes as needed. The 2008-09 York University strike was, in the first instance, symptomatic of a university system in crisis. The results indicate that contract faculty feel too demoralized and depressed to vote when they have been stripped of their democractic right to collective bargaining in the name of  “financial stability.” They may feel devalued when the interests of “students based upon academic integrity” are pitted against any collective effort to expose the casualization of acadmic labour and its consequences.

In short, the results show that we have much work to do before the next round of collective bargaining begins. In the double crisis of the university and the economy, continuous organizing and mobilizing will be necessary. Let us work together so as to not waste this crisis.

Tags: , ,


Apr 09 2009

Another Way Must be Tried

Category: News,Post-strike Discussion (2009)Bob Hanke @ 8:59 am
After Nine Months, a Labour Pact at York U.

by

Strike-weary York University can look forward to at least two years of labour peace if teaching assistants and contract faculty approve a tentative deal reached this week.

The Canadian Union of Public Employees 3903, which shut down the sprawling campus this winter for three months in a strike largely over the growing use of part-time instructors, has reached a tentative three-year settlement with York with the help of a mediator appointed two months ago by Queen’s Park.

The union representing 3,400 contract professors, teaching assistants and graduate assistants announced yesterday on its website it was “pleased” to have reached a settlement with York after nine months of negotiations.

The contract would apply until September 2011.

The Ontario government legislated the union back to work in February after the longest university strike in English-speaking Canada, and handed the dispute to a mediator.

But for students facing another two months of school because of the extended school year, news of the agreement seemed anti-climactic.

“I hope both sides are happy, but now that I’m back in class, they can take as long as they want to get a deal,” said kinesiology student Catherine Divaris, who helped launch a website during the 85-day strike urging an end to the disruption.

“Because of the strike I’m in midterms in April instead of finals,” said the fourth-year student, who has applied to law schools across the province, including York’s Osgoode Hall.

“The one good thing is, a three-year deal means there is no danger of another strike until at least 2011.”

_________________________________________________________________

Another “good thing” for York students and contract faculty who feel access to education is a democratic right and a public good, and not just another commodified service and a private value, would be to start mobilizing to  strike against tuition hikes.  Last week, the L’Association pour une Solidarité Syndicale Étudiante organized strikes with several universities and CEGEPS,  drawing students into the streets with calls for free education. To read more, click here.

_________________________________________________________________

Commentary of Last Month: Lessons of the York University Strike by Chris Bailey, March 2, 2009.

Tags: ,


Apr 06 2009

New OCUFA Survey in Sync with Strike Issues

Category: Post-strike Discussion (2009),ResearchBob Hanke @ 8:48 pm

OCUFA has sounded the warning over declining quality again, but are the full-time university president and the part-time Board of Governors listening?

In Profs blast lazy first-year students, Toronto Star education reporter writes:

The question on student preparedness was part of a larger survey of professors completed in February and March that asked about all aspects of campus life. More than 60 per cent of professors said they were teaching larger classes than three years ago, and that not only has hiring slowed down, but so has the creation of full-time tenured positions – which was an issue in the recent strike by teaching assistants and contract faculty at York University.

To read the whole April 6, 2009 front-page story, click here.

To download the key findings of this online province-wide survey, click on the OCUFA 2009 Questionnaire.

Tags: ,


Mar 11 2009

Professor Untangles Twisted Tale of Conversion Program

Category: Post-strike Discussion (2009)Bob Hanke @ 7:55 pm

Conversion Program Not Unique

Re: “The York strike: a tangled tale  of entitlements,” Opinions, Feb. 18, 2009.
By Richard Wellen, Chair, Division of Social Science, Faculty of Arts (excerpted from the Excalibur, March 11, 2009)

In this opinion piece, Prof. Gerrard Naddaf questions the very legitimacy of conversions, or the Special Renewable Contract-type (SRC) appointments,demanded by CUPE 3903 during the strike. The basic thrust of his piece is that there is only one good way to make a “real” academic appointment and that over-ambitious unions shouldn’t get in the way of this process. As Naddaf acknowledges, however, the way “free competition” works in regular academic appointments is prejudicial to those with long service in contract positions. Folks who teach for many years as contract faculty do so with almost no support for doing the kind of research that will later allow them to secure a tenure-stream job. Many contract faculty members originally pursued contract positions because they did not have the sufficient family financial resources to do research without a paid job. These and other obstacles to  career progress for contract faculty have been well documented (see, for example, Indhu Rajagopal’s book, Hidden Academics: Contract Faculty in Canadian Universities). For Nadaff, long service and other obstacles shouldn’t be recognized to ensure fairness in academic appointments, and, even if long service leads to one being unfairly left out, that’s just the way the academic game is played. No argument is actually given as to why we should accept this situation, or why those in the conversion pool who have research publications and have taught a number of years should not be given a chance to apply for tenure.

To read, the rest of this opinion, click here.

Tags: , ,


Mar 06 2009

Complaints to the International Labour Organization

Category: News,Post-strike Discussion (2009)Bob Hanke @ 4:52 pm

By Michael Skinner

FYI, the doc Complaints to the International Labour Organization (ILO) by unions in Canada against Restrictive Labour Legislation 1982 – 2008 can be found here.

Details of individual cases can be found by inputting specific case titles from above list using the search function here.

It will be useful to have more opinions on this matter. There is also background info re: the ILO here if you are at all interested.

Raj Virk informed me the CLC rep to the ILO is making inquiries re: a complaint on behalf of CUPE 3903 while he is currently in Brussels for ILO meetings.

Tags:


« Previous PageNext Page »