Jan 13 2009

Unit 2 Meeting, Friday Jan. 16th

Category: Eventsjonnyj @ 1:24 pm

The time and location of the next Unit 2 meeting are as follows:

Friday, January 16th, from 5-8pm.
246 Bloor St W (at Bedford), Rm. 548

Food will be available and attendance at the meeting will count as 3 hours of picket duty. The agenda of the meeting is as follows (note: feel free to propose additions to the agenda as a comment to this post):

  1. Summary of forced ratification preparations to date.
  2. Activities for Monday and Tuesday forced ratification voting days.
  3. Contingency planning for after the forced ratification.

Tags: , ,


Jan 11 2009

Transit Workers Say No to City’s Offer

Category: NewsBob Hanke @ 3:43 pm

By Patrick Dare, Cassandra Drudi, Thulasi Srikanthan and Jake Rupert

(excerpted from the Ottawa Citizen, January 9, 2009)


OTTAWA – Members of the city’s largest transit union rejected the latest contract offer nearly three-to-one, in vote results revealed late Thursday.

“We knew our membership would support our recommendation,” said Jim Haddad, secretary-treasurer of the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 279, whose leaders advised 2,300 striking OC Transpo workers to reject the offer. “We’re ready to go back to the table. Hopefully, they’ll negotiate properly now with us instead of bargaining through the media.”

To read the rest of this story, click here.

Tags:


Jan 11 2009

Why Unit 2 Should Vote No

Category: Point of InformationBob Hanke @ 1:29 am

Why Unit 2  Should Vote No

On January 9, 2009, York University asked the Ministry of Labour to hold a forced ratification vote on the January 7th offer which was CUPE 3903 membership deemed unacceptable at the general membership meeting held on January 8th.

To read why this offer does not represent job security for Unit 2 members, click Why Cupe Unit 2 Should Vote No!

Tags:


Jan 11 2009

York Vote a Dangerous Signal (Again)

Category: Strike Discussion (2008-09)Bob Hanke @ 1:15 am

Those of us who were at York during the 2000-01 strike may remember that we have seen collective bargaining rights curtailed by a forced ratification vote before.  For those who were not around or have forgotten this episode in York’s history, here is an excerpt of David McNally’s commentary written just before a forced ratification vote–seven years ago.

York Vote a Dangerous Signal
By David McNally (2000-01)

“In the present state of society, in fact, it is the possibility of the strike which enables workers to negotiate with their employers on terms of approximate equality. . . If the right to strike is suppressed, or seriously limited, the trade union movement becomes nothing more than one institution among many in the service of capitalism: a convenient organization for disciplining workers, occupying their leisure time, and ensuring their profitability for business.”

—  Pierre Trudeau, The Asbestos Strike

Much delight greeted the news last month that the York University Administration could force its striking teaching assistants, contract faculty and research assistants to vote on a management offer. After a two month disruption of classes, many hoped that those of us who work and study at York might soon get back to our classrooms. Behind this news, however, loomed another message, one that is ought to be deeply troubling to those who care about the democratic rights of trade unions in our society.

The contract vote that members of CUPE 3903 will conduct this Thursday and Friday is the result of a Tory-created section of the Ontario Labour Relations Act (OLRA) that enables an employer to force a vote on a contract proposal rejected by a union’s elected negotiating committee and/or its executive. There is nothing innocent about this provision of the Act; it is merely one component in a series of legal changes designed to give employers more weapons against unions.  From its inception, the Harris government undertook a vigorous attack on trade union rights.

To read the complete commentary, click York Vote a Dangerous Signal.

Tags:


Jan 10 2009

A Subversive Idea!

Category: Strike Discussion (2008-09)Bob Hanke @ 1:21 pm

I have a subversive idea to discuss with the Unit 2 folks. What if we started posting our lectures online on a centralized website (Virtual York!), and asked the students (and anyone for that matter) to pay $20 per month to access the online courses? would it be considered a strike breaking?   We could also have online discussion and interaction with the students involving the Tas. The money can be used to pay both the CDs and the Tas based on the number of courses they cover. This would take off the pressures on us from both the students and their parents to end the strike and would support us financially to prolong the stike against the ratification vote.  It would also proof the redundancy of the
obsolete way Universities are managed today. I am sure there are many details that should be worked out but I wanted to know what do you think generally about the idea.

In Sol. Reza Rahbari (Sociology and Social Sciences)

Tags:


« Previous PageNext Page »