May 04 2009

University Finance and the Financial Meltdown

Category: Book Reviews,University FinanceBob Hanke @ 10:05 am

The Universities in Trouble (Or, Why we Need A User’s Guide to the Budget Crisis at York University like A User’s Guide to the Budget Crisis at UNC-CH)

by Andrew Delbanco (excerpted from the New York Review of Books, 56(8), May 14, 2009)

1.

Since the financial meltdown began to accelerate last summer, the world has changed utterly for colleges and universities just as it has for everyone who had not been stashing cash under the mattress. Along with failing banks, auto manufacturers, and insurance companies, universities have been making headlines—especially those whose gigantic endowments (Harvard’s was approaching $40 billion before the crash) have sharply declined. Last year, politicians and pundits were complaining about the unseemly wealth of such institutions. This year, alumni are getting e-mails from beleaguered presidents assuring them that Alma Mater will somehow ride out the storm.

The headlines tend to focus on the collapse of institutional investments, which, indeed, has been spectacular. No one quite knows how much has been lost. Led by the example of Yale’s chief investment officer, David Swensen, whose Pioneering Portfolio Management is described by the chair of the Yale investment committee as “the best book ever written on managing institutional investment portfolios,” endowment managers had been shifting large sums toward illiquid assets such as private equity partnerships, which typically require periodic infusions of fresh capital, and whose current market value is virtually impossible to assess. This and other versions of “an unconventional approach to institutional investment” (the subtitle of Swensen’s book, first published in 2000 and recently reissued in revised form) worked very well during the boom years, bringing home double-digit returns.

Today, leading universities are reporting endowment losses of 20 percent or more, but some informed observers think that the true figure, at least in some cases, may be closer to 50 percent. Actions that would never have been contemplated a year ago, such as selling severely depreciated assets in order to meet cash obligations or issuing bonds at punitive interest rates, are no longer unheard of. And in the current market, would-be sellers and borrowers are finding few buyers or lenders.[1]

To read the rest of this review, click here.

Tags:


Mar 11 2009

Enough (Bad Education Policy) is Enough

Category: NewsBob Hanke @ 1:23 pm

President Shoukri’s February 26, 2009 address to Senate was strangely silent on educational policy and the real problem of chronic underfunding. Protecting the quality of the higher education environment will require more than the administration’s “Integrated Resource Planning project” or a “task force” on labour relations; it will require a dialogue on university fianancing and government educational policy. To remain true to York’s historic mission, education as a public good must be defended at every level of the institution.

For starters:

Tuition hikes are wrong way to close university funding gap
Transferring load to students amounts to the privatization of higher education

By Brian Brown, President of the Ontario Confederation of University Faculty Associations (excerpted from thestar.com, March 11, 2009)

University funding is a difficult and complex issue. At the best of times, it must be dealt with thoughtfully, intelligently, rationally and with care and sensitivity.

These are not the best of times. They may be the worst of times. Universities with their capacity to train the next generation of knowledge workers while relieving unemployment have a vital role in both the short-term and long-term health of our economy.

The decisions that are made will affect not just students and their families but Ontario as well.

We cannot roll the dice with our higher education system. It has to be effective and affordable and deliver the quality of education that will keep Ontario knowledge workers at the cutting edge.

Degree mills won’t do that, which is what we could be looking at if government doesn’t step up to the plate. University financing has to be a provincial and national priority.

To read the rest of this opinion, click here.

Tags:


« Previous Page