May 04 2009

University Finance and the Financial Meltdown

Category: Book Reviews,University FinanceBob Hanke @ 10:05 am

The Universities in Trouble (Or, Why we Need A User’s Guide to the Budget Crisis at York University like A User’s Guide to the Budget Crisis at UNC-CH)

by Andrew Delbanco (excerpted from the New York Review of Books, 56(8), May 14, 2009)

1.

Since the financial meltdown began to accelerate last summer, the world has changed utterly for colleges and universities just as it has for everyone who had not been stashing cash under the mattress. Along with failing banks, auto manufacturers, and insurance companies, universities have been making headlines—especially those whose gigantic endowments (Harvard’s was approaching $40 billion before the crash) have sharply declined. Last year, politicians and pundits were complaining about the unseemly wealth of such institutions. This year, alumni are getting e-mails from beleaguered presidents assuring them that Alma Mater will somehow ride out the storm.

The headlines tend to focus on the collapse of institutional investments, which, indeed, has been spectacular. No one quite knows how much has been lost. Led by the example of Yale’s chief investment officer, David Swensen, whose Pioneering Portfolio Management is described by the chair of the Yale investment committee as “the best book ever written on managing institutional investment portfolios,” endowment managers had been shifting large sums toward illiquid assets such as private equity partnerships, which typically require periodic infusions of fresh capital, and whose current market value is virtually impossible to assess. This and other versions of “an unconventional approach to institutional investment” (the subtitle of Swensen’s book, first published in 2000 and recently reissued in revised form) worked very well during the boom years, bringing home double-digit returns.

Today, leading universities are reporting endowment losses of 20 percent or more, but some informed observers think that the true figure, at least in some cases, may be closer to 50 percent. Actions that would never have been contemplated a year ago, such as selling severely depreciated assets in order to meet cash obligations or issuing bonds at punitive interest rates, are no longer unheard of. And in the current market, would-be sellers and borrowers are finding few buyers or lenders.[1]

To read the rest of this review, click here.

Tags:


Jan 06 2009

Inaugural Issue of the CUPE 3903 Unit 2 Chronicle!

Category: Newslettersjonnyj @ 1:47 pm

The first issue of the CUPE 3903 Unit 2 Chronicle is now available for download:

The CUPE 3903 Unit 2 Chronicle – Issue 1

Tags: , , , ,


Jan 04 2009

Can We See The Future of York University in the U.S?

Category: Book ReviewsBob Hanke @ 2:20 pm

Of possible interest:

How the University Works: Higher Education and the Low-Wage Nation

by Marc Bousquet. New York: New York University Press, 2008.

Reviewed by Doug Lorimer (excerpted from the CAUT Bulletin, December 2008)

Those of us who work and study in a contemporary North American university or college are aware of the growing divergence between the idealized past of the academy and present-day realities of the working lives of students and faculty. In his study, How the University Works, Marc Bousquet forces us to lay aside our illusions and come face-to-face with the realities of the regressive changes that have occurred in post-secondary education over the last three decades.

To read the rest of this review, click here.


Jan 04 2009

Some Academics More Equal than Others

Category: Books and ArticlesBob Hanke @ 1:48 pm

By Cindy Oliver, Catherine Christie, Petra Ganzenmueller, Geoff Martin, George Davison, Sandra Hoenle, Kelly MacFarlane & Anne Skoczylas (excerpted from the CAUT Bulletin November 2008).

When is an academic not an academic? This is not a rhe­torical question, since in most Ca­nadian universities, contract academic staff do not have the same status as a tenured or tenure-track staff, regardless of qualifications and experience.

Remuneration and access to sup­port for scholarly activity are usually the source of employment disadvantage for academics working on per course or limited-term contracts when compared with perma­nent colleagues. This disadvantage is particularly noticeable when the availability of both in-house and external research money is involved. CAUT’s contract academic staff committee believes academic staff associations should direct their attention to redressing a situation which deters, and often prevents, contract staff from engaging in the vital research required in order to participate in a full academic career.

In conjunction with pro rata hiring policies, access to internal and external funding programs would allow contract staff to achieve a real degree of parity with their tenured colleagues. Only then could the designation “part-time” be a true measure of employment choice rather than a euphemism designed to disguise the exploitation of members of the academic proletariat.

Access to research funds is an important feature of the continuing and uphill struggle with increasingly market-driven university administrations to create a more equitable professional environment for contract academic staff.

To read the rest of this article, click http://www.cautbulletin.ca/en_article.asp?articleid=2714


Jan 04 2009

The Neoliberal University: Looking at the York Strike

Category: Books and ArticlesBob Hanke @ 1:08 pm

By Eric Newstadt (excerpted from the Socialist Project E-Bulletin No.  165)

Placed neatly in the middle of a global economic maelstrom, it is near impossible to understand or predict what, if any, consequences the strike by 3500 odd teaching and research assistants and contract faculty at York University in Toronto (represented by Canadian Union of Public Employees Local 3903) will have for higher education in Ontario and throughout Canada. While there are some early indications that the strike – which began in early November and continues to shut down the university – at York is aiding (at least mildly) in negotiations at the University of Toronto (whose teaching assistants, research assistants and contract faculty are all presently in negotiations), the strike seems also to have engendered the anger and vitriol of the public such that the viability of similar strikes in the sector are in question. And while the tenor of the action was and remains pitched firmly at rolling back the “neoliberal university,” it is questionable whether even outright victory at York would or could have such far-reaching consequences across the university sector.

Of course, there is only so much that can be accomplished in a single round of bargaining. Even if it may not yet be possible to outline how history will record the current work action, there are nonetheless some very definitive things that we can say about the particular conditions which have produced the strike of 2008. And we can also weigh and measure the degree to which the strike holds the promise of ameliorating those conditions (at York if not throughout the province), either temporarily or on a more lasting basis.

To read more about the political economy of the neoliberal university,  click on http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/bullet165.html


« Previous Page