Jan 27 2009

Letter from Cheri DiNovo (NDP) – MPP for Parkdale-High Park

Category: Point of Information,Strike Discussion (2008-09)jonnyj @ 1:15 pm

The following is a response from Cheri DiNovo, which nicely contextualizes the strike and back-to-work legislation within the larger educational and fiscal trends that are ongoing at Ontario universities. Read on…


As you know, this strike has been about issues of grave importance to the quality of post-secondary education in Ontario. In many ways, the strike has highlighted the significant lack of funding that the province gives to large post-secondary institutions like York University. In another way, as the Canadian Union of Public Employees Local 3903 has highlighted, it is also about the working conditions of contract faculty and TAs, who perform upwards of fifty percent of all teaching at the University. New Democrats believe the chronic hiring of mostly part-time and casual workers at low wages has become a deliberate strategy on the part of York University and the McGuinty government, which refuses to fund universities to the point that Ontario is now ranked last among all provinces in per capita university funding.

Unfortunately, contract faculty and TA wages have failed to keep pace with their increased value within the University sector. Indeed, as Marc Bousquet has recently pointed out in his informative book, How the University Works: Higher Education and the Low-Wage Nation (2008), universities like York have remodelled their core business practices from one of higher education to one of fundraising, which increasingly relies on corporate donations to fund research and infrastructure. One of the drastic side effects of this transition has been a significant decline in tenured faculty positions. Currently, York is offering contract instructors 17 five-year contracts over three years. The union says that this is inadequate since there are already 67 contract faculty members with more than ten years of experience. It is clear that contract faculty positions are not a substitute for tenure conversions. However, there have been over 100 retirements in the past five years, which have not been replaced. Clearly, the University plans to replace these full time tenured faculty members with temporary part-time contract faculty. We believe this is weakening the standards of education in the province.

The York University administration, aided by the inaction of the McGuinty government, has exacerbated the crisis. The back-to-work legislation provides them with a convenient crutch that strips away the rights of workers to collectively bargain.

The strike at York is an attempt by a union of dedicated and hard-working TAs and contract faculty to protect the core values of the university: strong public education, equitable access to university, and fair and reasonable contracts for workers in the university sector. We support the struggle to preserve high quality public education in the province. We thus oppose the McGuinty government’s attempt to ignore the chronic lack of public funding at York University by legislating legally striking workers back-to-work. We also call on the University administration to return to the bargaining table and treat these workers with dignity and respect.

__________________________________________________________________

To read a transcript of today’s debates in the Ontario Legislative Assembly, download the Legislative Assembly of Ontario Hansard Transcripts January 27 2009

Tags: , ,


Jan 27 2009

Howard Hampton’s Speech from Provincial Legislature, Jan. 26th

Category: News,Point of Informationjonnyj @ 12:58 pm

http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/house-proceedings/house_detail.do?Date=2009-01-26&Parl=39&Sess=1&locale=en#P286_65679

Mr. Howard Hampton: I’m pleased to be able to participate in this debate. I want to say at the outset that this is an important debate. This is our job, to ensure that good legislation is passed and to ensure that bad legislation is not passed. There are a number of issues surrounding this legislation that I think the people across Ontario ought to know about.

In contrast, the McGuinty Liberals suddenly, in a sudden mood of panic, are saying, “This legislation should be passed with no debate, no discussion, no examination of the facts, no questions, no answers, no thought, no criticism.” This is, all a sudden, panic. These students were out of the classroom in the fall. What did the McGuinty Liberals do? I remember being in this House and debating material that was, frankly, of little consequence. I remember coming here some mornings and seeing that the House was recessed because the McGuinty Liberals had nothing to present to the Legislature. But now suddenly it’s a panic, and we’re all supposed to forget our brains and we’re all supposed to forget our jobs. We’re not supposed to ask any questions. We’re not supposed to ask about the facts or conduct any examination or demand any answers. Well, I intend to do my job. I intend to ask some questions. If Liberals want to behave like some kinds of mindless automatons, you do that, but there are serious questions that need to be asked here. The government had better come up with some answers.

Continue reading “Howard Hampton’s Speech from Provincial Legislature, Jan. 26th”

Tags:


Jan 27 2009

An Open Letter to the Premier

Category: Point of InformationBob Hanke @ 11:25 am

An open letter to Premier Dalton McGuinty

Dear Premier McGuinty,

We, the more than 3,000 contract faculty, teaching assistants, and graduate assistants of CUPE 3903, are writing to express our disappointment in your decision to introduce back-to-work legislation.

We want this strike to end as soon as possible but this should happen at the bargaining table, not through legislation.

Back-to-work legislation is unfair and inappropriate; CUPE 3903 has been ready and willing to negotiate since day one of this strike. York administration has not.

Back-to-work legislation sets a dangerous precedent. It tells the York administration and all other employers that if they refuse to bargain, the province will step in and do their work for them.

If you really want to help ensure the integrity and quality of education at York University – and all post-secondary institutions in Ontario –invest in affordable and accessible education for graduate students and stable employment for university contract professors.

Ontario ranks second-last among all provinces in terms of what it spends on post-secondary education. With a willing employer, we can negotiate our collective agreement, but it is up to you to decide to address the underfunding of Ontario’s universities. Let’s work together for a better future for post-secondary education in Ontario.

Sincerely,

Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 3903

CUPE 3903 – Still holding the line for quality, accessible education and a fair contract.

Tags: ,


Jan 26 2009

Negotiate, don’t Legislate! Rally on January 27

Category: EventsBob Hanke @ 10:37 pm

To all educators, students, parents, workers, unions, community groups, activists, progressive allies and concerned citizens…

Join us to oppose regressive back-to-work legislation! Join us to challenge the attack on our democratic rights!

When: Tuesday, January 27, 10 am. Where: Ministry of Labour, 400 University Avenue (St. Patrick subway station at University and Dundas)

When: 11:30 am. Where:  Legislative Assembly of Ontario, 1 Queen’s Park

____________________________________________________________

To read a transcript of today’s debate, including NDP Leader Howard Hampton’s 1 hour presentation, download the Legislative Assembly of Ontario Hansard Transcripts January 26, 2009 and skip to page 29

____________________________________________________________

Withdraw back-to-work legislation, OFL tells Ontario government

(TORONTO) — The Ontario government must change its course of action in the York University strike, says the Ontario Federation of Labour (OFL).

To read the press release, click here.

____________________________________________________________

Letter of the Day: Stefan Kipfer Back-to-Work Letter Jan 25 2009



Jan 26 2009

Why I Voted to Continue Strike

Category: News,Strike Discussion (2008-09)jonnyj @ 4:39 pm

Article by Eric McMillan, reposted from http://www.vaughantoday.ca/story.php?id=1406

First a little disclosure:

Although I’m an editor with this newspaper, I am also a doctorate student at York University, which means I am a teaching assistant and part of the strike that has shutdown that institution..

Unlike most of my colleagues there, I’m not entirely reliant for income upon my work and studies at York. But I do have some knowledge of the situation of my fellow teachers and researchers to pass on to readers.

For a start, the strike is not just about wages. The media, taking their cue from the university administration, continually harp on the wage demands. But from what I gather, the difference between what is offered and what we would settle for is small. No worker I’ve talked to has said they would have taken the strike this far over the wage issue alone.

More important is what is loosely called “job security for contract faculty”. I wish the union would stop using this phrase, though. It invites the yahoo responses of “Don’t they know there’s a recession?” and “Nobody has job security these days!”

People, this is not a demand for guaranteed cushy jobs for life.

Rather, it’s recognizing the university has been shifting its teacher funding from full-time professors on staff, with all the benefits and research opportunities, to workers on short-term contracts without the same benefits and research budgets. These contract teachers have to apply every year for each course they teach, never knowing whether or not they’ll be getting a load they can live on. Some have been kept hanging on like this for 10, 15 or 20 years.

Another key demand is reinstatement of benefits and funds to 2005 levels. These are mostly monies established to get teachers and grad students through difficult times and to aid their professional development — something that should be seen as benefiting the entire university community.

No outrageous increase is being sought, only the reversal of a long slide.

I can outline here only the bare bones of the issues. But I encourage politicians and bloggers who want to express moral indignation over the strike to investigate and consider these issues more deeply before proclaiming “Fire them all!” or “Force them back to work!”

But, you ask, what about the poor students who are getting behind in their schoolwork or who might miss their summer jobs because the university is dysfunctional? Don’t those greedy strikers care?

We talk about this among ourselves too. We all want to get back to our teaching and our own studies. We’ve all been students ourselves and we sympathize.

But when we weigh the inconveniences created for students against the long-term problems affecting the livelihoods of our people in their careers. . . . Well, we have to ask: Doesn’t the university care about us or students? Why do they continually walk away from the bargaining table?

These are all reasons why this week, in a forced ratification vote, a solid majority of all sections of our union turned down the last offer, effectively continuing the strike.

You may or may not agree with our decisions. Even within the union, a full range of opinions are expressed. I have to say this is one very educated, intelligent, passionate and socially committed local.

Some commentators have implied this is another so-called case of big unions bullying its members and dictating to the public. Apart from the absurdity of equating the power of unions to that of big business, especially given the current economic mess created by multibillion-dollar corporations, the process that’s occurred in this case belies that rhetoric. If anything, these events have shown in these difficult times we need unions more than ever to preserve the interests of ordinary people.

A group of 3,500 thoughtful and well-intentioned employees at the university have been led to take collective action we feel is needed to protect ourselves, as well as to help other workers, students and the educational system in general.

Agree with us or not, recognizing this should at least give you pause to consider the possibility that we may have a point.

Tags: ,


« Previous PageNext Page »